The billion dollar wish
At a press conference on Monday, Jan. 25, Governor Christine Gregoire said once again that she hopes to get up to $1 billion from the federal government to help with Washington state’s $2.6 billion budget crisis. “We need the federal government as a partner,” said Gregoire. Yet it seems highly unlikely that the federal government will bail out Washington state before this year’s legislative session ends on March 11. That means lawmakers must either raise taxes, make deep cuts in state spending or, most likely, both.
Around $518 million of Gregoire’s $1 billion wish is related to the state’s health care spending on three programs: Medicaid, the Basic Health Plan and General Assistance – Unemployable ($400 million is education related, but that’s a story for another day).
Here’s the good news on federal health care money: In Section 2001 (a)(4)(A) of the 2409-page health-care reform bill that passed the U.S. Senate on December 23, 2009, U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., managed to insert an amendment that would aid Washington as well as other states. “Senator Cantwell has done yeoman’s work,” said Gov. Gregoire.
The Cantwell amendment essentially would, starting on April 1, 2010, get the feds to match the state’s spending on the Basic Health Plan, which is subsidized health insurance for the working poor — those who earn up to twice as much as the federal poverty line. Jonathan Seib, the governor’s health policy advisor, says that, if enacted into law, the Cantwell amendment could net Washington state between $25 and $40 million in payments for BHP through the end of the 2009-11 budget.
Elsewhere in the U.S. Senate’s health care bill, there is a new proviso that all Americans who make up to 133 percent of the federal poverty rate would qualify for Medicaid, according to analysts at the state Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS). That is also good news for Washington because it would pick up the health-care costs of the state’s General Assistance – Unemployable (GAU) program for poor, disabled, childless adults. DSHS analysts estimate the federal money at about $28 million for the rest of the biennium.
Of course, the U.S. Senate’s health care reform bill, and the Cantwell amendment along with it, will almost certainly die. That’s because of the nation’s newest U.S. senator, Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown, who won a special election on January 19 for the seat held previously by deceased Senator Ted Kennedy. Brown’s election has all but killed any comprehensive legislation reforming the U.S. health insurance system by changing the nation’s political climate and giving Republicans 41 votes to filibuster in the U.S. Senate.
State Senator Chris Marr (D-Spokane), a leader of the Senate’s Democratic caucus, is not counting on the federal money. “Any reasonable assessment is that those dollars are in doubt now,” Marr says. “The size and the certainty are very much in doubt [and] the timing is not good. All the way around it’s bad news.”
So if the money for BHP and GAU health insurance seems unlikely to arrive, what about the Medicaid money? Medicaid is a program mostly targeted to providing health insurance to poor parents with dependent children. It is already established as a program that is jointly funded by federal and state governments. Last year, the U.S. Congress, in the federal stimulus bill, increased Medicaid payments to the states but only through the end of 2010. Now states are lobbying Congress to extend that increase. “A six-month extension would be [worth] roughly $450 million” to Washington state, says Seib, Gregoire’s health policy advisor.
The problem is that this proposal has not even taken the form of federal legislation yet. The tooth fairy seems like a better bet for health care help arriving by March 11 than a federal Medicaid bonus.
So why is the governor holding out the false hope of federal money? Evidently because she so dislikes the other alternatives: raising taxes or cutting programs. At Monday’s press conference, she said, “Property tax is off the table. It’s difficult to look at the B&O [business and occupation] tax and it’s difficult to look at the sales tax when you are in an economic recovery.” Those three taxes are the only significant revenue sources that state government has at its disposal.
Earlier in the month she said of her all-cuts budget released in December, “The budget did not reflect my values.”
So she keeps on hoping that federal money will arrive.
If wishes were dollars, we’d all spend like kings.
economy [a] olympianews.org




Comments
By Fat-tailed on January 29th, 2010 at 7:46 am
Good piece, pathetic governance.
Gregoire might as well just invest a few million in other states’ lottery tickets and hope for a win.
By Sarajane Siegfriedt on January 31st, 2010 at 9:11 pm
There are plenty of ways to raise revenue that would achieve the desired results, without raising the sales tax, the property tax or the (unfair) B&O tax. First, the Legislature should get busy and get serious about rescinding the non-performing tax exemptions, starting with the largest. That would be the $3.2 billion over 20 years given to Boeing in 2003 in exchange for bringing 1,200 new Dreamliner jobs to Washington State. Instead, these jobs have gone to South Carolina. Why in the world is the Democratic majority so cautious about this “clawback”? Boeing certainly hasn’t performed. Other states have done it. It would send a message to others who make promises they don’t keep. This is $160 million a year we could really use, and I have yet to find someone (not an elected official) who doesn’t feel it would be very popular, perhaps even win or retain some Democratic seats in November.
According to the Economic Opportunity Institute, there are $70 billion of such tax breaks, an amount that exceeds the whole state budget. They figure $30 million of these are “readily accessible.” While some may marginally be doing the job they promised, which is the low, low standard set by the state Legislature, in a deficit environment, the Legislature has to ask if there is a better use of taxpayer money, if goals are not being met.
After possibilities for closing tax loopholes have been exhausted (again, starting with Boeing), the Legislature could turn to the Washington Budget and Policy Center for its proposal to modernize the state sales tax–not by raising it, but by extending it to all services. This is long overdue since we have been a service economy for decades. It has the advantage of being naturally progressive, since wealthy people buy the most services (lawyers, accountants, nannies) and the poorest people may end up paying $1 more on a haircut or $2 more for a set of nails.
This solution alone would produce over $1 billion a year, happily, the amount the Governor may be looking in vain to the federal government for.